Sodomites Call for Violence Against Christian
!Supporters of Prop 8
Lynchburg, VA – In a stunning reaction to the passage of state constitutional marriage protection amendments in California, Arizona and Florida, several self identified homosexuals on a number of homosexual blogs are advocating violence against Christians and other supporters of traditional marriage. Additionally, some homosexuals are calling for church burnings in response to yesterday’s three state referenda in defense of natural marriage.
In a blog entry titled “You’ll Want to Punch them” on Queerty.com, poster “BillyBob Thornton” wrote, “… I have never considered being a violent radical extremist for our Equal Rights, But now I think maybe I should consider becoming one.” “Stenar” asked, “Can someone in CA please go burn down the Mormon temples there, PLEASE I mean seriously. DO IT.” “Angelo Ventura,” said, “… hope they all rot in hell, those servants of a lying, corrupt devil!
BAN RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM!” And, “Jonathan,” warned, “I’m going to give them something to be f – ing scared of. … I’m a radical who is now on a mission to make them all pay for what they’ve done.”
Meanwhile, over at JoeMyGod.blogspot.com, “World O Jeff,” said, “Burn their f–ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers” While, “Tread,” wrote, “I hope the No on 8 people have a long list and long knives.” “Joe,” stated, “I swear, I’d murder people with my bare hands this morning.”
And on the Americablog.com Web site, “scottinsf” posted, “Trust me. I’ve got a big list of names of mormons and catholics that were big supporters of Prop 8. … As far as mormons and catholics … I warn them to watch their backs.”
Matt Barber, Director of Cultural Affairs with both Liberty Alliance Action and Liberty Counsel, said, “This is not just a matter of some people blowing off steam because they’re not happy with a political outcome. This is criminal activity. The homosexual lobby is always calling for ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ and playing the role of victim. They claim to deplore violence and ‘hate.’ Here we have homosexuals inciting, and directly threatening, violence against Christians. This is not free speech; these are ‘hate crimes’ under the existing definition. Imagine if Christian Web sites were advocating such violence against homosexuals. There’d be outrage, and rightfully so. It’d be national front-page news. Federal authorities should immediately investigate these threats and prosecute the perpetrators to the fullest extent of the law. I also call on the Human Rights Campaign, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and other leaders within the homosexual lobby to immediately call for an end to these homosexual threats of violence against Christians.”
Gay leaders will lose credibility if they don’t denounce this hateful talk.
Now if we listen to Ron Paul and get all government OUT of any involvement with marriage, we won’t have this kind of problem.
All of this started from states offering benefits to people, with differences based on marital status. So in addition to someone already being robbed at gunpoint (the states guns) to give to some parasite, we now get an issue that adds to the fire already burning from affirmative action and lopsided family courts.
Now if there was no government intervention and socialism to start with, this would be a non-issue.
But what’s the answer? While the left gets their socialism, the right clamors for government to define what nature already deems obvious. It’s as foolish as asking the state for a right to have a gun.
As usual, the left sings, the right tapdances.
If we could stick to the issue and:
- No more money being taken from one person and given to someone else and from that point it does not matter who does what with who and who has anything to say about the matter.
- Get the state as far away from marriage as possible because having already destroyed the family, conservatives should have learned a lesson by now.
(of course the McCain nomination proved that conservatives don’t learn anything any more than they actually conserved).
Now I get to watch “gay” leaders fight in ways that gun owners, real money advocates, and tax protestor only dream of getting away with. Showing even more so that this is entirely a staged and controlled issue to perpetuate the false left-right paradigm and keep us distracted from the real issues.
I think your analysis falls short of the scope of the problem, but requires a fuller response than seems appropriate for a comment on a blog post. I’m going to try to do a whole article.