During the Reagan Administration Joe Sobran was my favorite columnist. I remember quipping that in MY world Buckley was the center, Sobran the right and George Will a liberal.
In 1988 Sobran championed the cause of my then-Presidential candidate Jack Kemp, agreeing with our (since-thoroughly-proven) assessment that if George H.W. Bush (41) became the GOP nominee, the Reagan Revolution was dead. I distributed copies of Sobran’s articles vainly attempting to wake enough rank-and-file Republicans to thwart the RNC’s “ANNOINTING,” that year. (Activists understood and began to revolt, but Joe Six-Pack still took Bush to be Reagan’s heir and did what they were told, despite all our efforts.)
Once a syndicated national force, Sobran was, shortly after the election of Bill Clinton, banished from National Review to the American media’s Siberia of non-visibility and I lost touch with his writing. I did not know of his apparent conversion to anarchism (in 2002) until 2008 or of his serious illness (in 2008) until 2010.
But I saw, in ’08, the roots of his philosophical drift (and “drift” aptly labels the description he, himself, provided for his shifts in thinking) dating back to his childhood.
Joe Sobran was what Pierce County GOP Vice Chair Kathy May has called “a poorly-catechized Catholic.” His basic notions of government had never been scripturally transformed. The “Church” had ministered to his heart, but not his mind. He had only dealt with government as it had manifested itself in his experience, historically, intellectually, particularly in the United States and particularly since 1865. He drifted, honestly, in search of answers sorely needed, largely ignoring the resources of his own faith.
As a “conservative” at the National Review he had assumed the legitimacy of “Constitutional” government, a priori, more sincerely than his peers, but floated in that spiritual void of “assumption.” Surely, he thought, the Constitution was “the answer.”
But as he saw the Constitution’s [I thought self-evident] powerlessness to save us, he went looking for a different messiah.
Deeply influenced by the libertarian genius, Murray Rothbard, beginning in the ’80s, Sobran (according to Sobran) wholly accepted the anti-Biblical view that “The essence of the state is its legal monopoly of force,” and reasoned, logically enough, to the equally false conclusion that, as Rothbard said, “…the state was nothing but a criminal gang writ large.” It is, from there, a small and logical step to anarchy and Joseph tells us he took it. Having sincerely, based on his false assumptions, logically and compellingly mis-defined the problem, he, logically and with great conviction, embraced the placebo.
But we already have anarchy. Rejoice.
Half a decade after embracing the intellectual antecedents of John Lennon’s “Imagine” (which, ironically, was penned in service to theoretical Communism) Sobran began to die. I have no details. But he re-structured his life around his health two years ago and I think it can be deduced that, at some point, he had to have theorized what was actually happening to him.
As someone who has, myself, most recently been recalled to that cosmic ante-room for consultation with the Almighty, I can report that it is, at once, sobering, wonderful, introspective and… uh, intoxicating. Stark reminders of one’s mortality can, I assume, be a terrifying experience if one is gazing into Darkness. But for those of us who have admitted our inadequacies as humans and accepted the Mercy purchased in blood, who have, moreover, nothing to lose in “death,” encountering its proximity is interesting (to say the least) and life-improving (to apprehend the best).
Let us pray that our brother found, in life, the philosophical Rock his wonderful mind seemed to wish to perceive, as through a glass, darkly.
But now, face to face.





Very well written – poetic actually.
Too often is chaos confused with Anarchy, God the Father of Jesus Christ is an anarchist.
Who, then, is the King of glory?
Lift up your heads, O ye gates;
And be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors;
and the King of glory shall come in.
Who is this “King” of glory?
I mean…
Just askin’…
The LORD strong and mighty,
The LORD mighty in battle.
Lift up your heads, O ye gates;
Even lift them up, ye everlasting doors;
and the King of glory shall come in.
Who is this King of glory?
The LORD of armies, he is the King of glory.
.
.
And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne.
And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold.
And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.
And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and behind.
And when those beasts give glory and honour and thanks to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever, the four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying, Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.
Thrones? Crowns? Power? “For the pleasure of the one that sits on the throne”?? This is a strange anarchy, Strat.
The subject of Whom you speak is not an ‘archist’, but… THE ARCHIST.
Both in the design of the universe, as well as in rule!
There are no others!
But what of we?
“But Jesus called them, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them.
But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:
And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all.
For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.”
Strat:
The subject of Whom you speak is not an ‘archist’, but… THE ARCHIST.
Both in the design of the universe, as well as in rule!
There are no others!
But what of we?
“But Jesus called them, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them.
But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:
And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all.
For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.”
http://www.sobran.com/reluctant.shtml