Sofia Wilen and Anna Ardin. Ardin had ties to a CIA backed anti-Fidel Castro group.
After voting for most Tea Party candidates in the November 2010 elections, America’s anti-feminist conservative and independent males may have early cause for concern about whether they will do so again in 2012. It will all depend on whether the Tea Party is seen as defending men against more feminist lawmaking and whether or not the new Congress passes the insane iVAWA law in January (the International Violence Against Women Act would fund radical feminist groups in other countries at a huge cost to the US taxpayer).
It is too early to tell if the influx of female GOP “Tea Party” candidates will vote with the Marxist NOW (National Organization Presuming to Represent Women) to regulate men in violation of the “small government” mandate that got them elected.
But some so-called conservative blogs that pretend they’re not really part of the lame stream media have already begun to pretend that conservatives naturally support radical feminist ideals. Sadly, wannabe Tea Party plebian males have already begun to comment that they are conservative White Knighters who want to be allied with and protect feminists (we saw this 12 years ago when some Republican males shockingly felt Monica Lewinsky was a “victim” of sexual harassment).
Take The Daily Caller and Mediaite.
Now every conservative male knows that false rape claims are something Marxist women promote. The Duke Lacrosse FalseRape Case is something every Republican male remembers. As much as any conservative male *might* dislike Julian Assange of Wikileaks, really conservative blogs show that no real man would agree that he should be taken down by allying with Swedish Christian Feminists who think that a man has raped a woman if he refuses to take an HIV test after she finds out he was also sleeping with her friend.
Why then, did Mediaite publish this post, with a link-in from The Daily Caller, calling for the normally liberal Keith Olbermann to apologize for repeating what most people believe about the false rape claims being made? It doesn’t matter that Olbermann is a liberal. In this case he was correct. A broken clock is correct twice per day.
You can want Assange shot at daylight for putting US troops at risk, but you have to want him cleared of radical feminist false rape charges first. Real rapes don’t involve two women each tweeting and texting afterwards about how much they love the guy, until they find out that the guy was two-timing them both.
The bottom lines:
1) The Assange “Rape” Case is about whether a man can be forced by a state to take an HIV test because some women slept with him and later realized he was sleeping with someone else as well (“cheating” on them). It is also about a country called Sweden that has been lost to Marxist feminism (the men there have been politically castrated along with the lion in the Swedish Army Coat of Arms) and shouldn’t be allowed to tell other European countries to harass men on their behalf.
2) Tea Party members need to understand that the media has control of “false flag” blogs that claim to support their ideals but are really trying to lead conservatives along by the nose and change their minds about things like feminism.
The Daily Caller and Mediate websites should be on notice regarding their support for radical feminism.
In all fairness, the Daily Caller is today lambasting the NOW (National Organization of feminists claiming to represent Women) for their renewed campaign against Hooters Restaurants:
http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/20/now-says-hooters-is-inappropriate-for-kids/
And “Concerned Women for America” (a conservative women’s group) is not showing solidarity with the NOW on that point.
So I wouldn’t say there’s a big ideological pro-feminism problem at the Daily Caller (let’s hope it stays that way).
Mediaite, on the other hand, might want to take a look at the contributing “conservative” editor who seems to be envious of Assange’s ability to attract young women who are ready to go to bed with a guy right away because he’s famous.
The leading editors of Mediaite may want to look at FreeRepublic.com where most of the grass roots conservatives see the Swedish “rape” charges as a left wing attack against a left winger.
Assange is hated even among Wikileaks people for making the decision to publish the names of Afghan intelligence sources. Many who support him vs Sweden don’t support him otherwise, nor do they like him as a human being.
But Sweden must not be allowed to jail a man outside of its own borders for refusing to take an HIV test after two women found out he’s was sleeping with both of them. And that refusal must not be called “rape” – thereby diminishing the actual crime of rape.